2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cdc.2020.100485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing molecular dynamics-derived pharmacophore models with docking: A study on CDK-2 inhibitors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the newly added pharmacophore features, the tolerance radius was increased by 0.15 Å to compensate for small deviations in the 3D coordinates. The computational details are reported in previously published papers [51,52]…”
Section: Myshape Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the newly added pharmacophore features, the tolerance radius was increased by 0.15 Å to compensate for small deviations in the 3D coordinates. The computational details are reported in previously published papers [51,52]…”
Section: Myshape Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residues that characterized the The pharmacophore features were decreased to five, the two hydrophobic features on the naphthyl ring of BIBR1532 were fused into one, and the tolerance radius for the new pharmacophore feature was increased by 0.15 Å to compensate for small deviations (Figure 1B). To improve the performance of the virtual screening (VS) process, the recent MYSHAPE (Molecular dYnamics SHared PharmacophorE) approach was used [51,52]. According to this approach, the exploration of the protein conformations by molecular dynamics coupled with the pharmacophore modeling improved the result of the VS concerning the corresponding model generated from the PDB coordinates set.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the constant update of hardware capabilities allowed the development of enhanced MD methods able to provide a full dynamical description of the target–ligand-binding events [ 14 ]. These methods are usually employed given that the sampling issue is fundamental to describing these slow processes while docking methods continue to be pivotal to screening large libraries, also assisted by MD [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular dynamics (MD) based pharmacophore models have emerged as quite powerful tools which not only account for the flexibility of the target(s), but also help to identify novel key interaction features in the binding sites (Spyrakis et al, 2015) which is otherwise unexplored in the crystal structures and may be harnessed to design new inhibitors (Choudhury et al, 2014(Choudhury et al, , 2015Choudhury and Bhardwaj, 2020;Guterres and Im, 2020). Literature reports several studies that have used molecular dynamics to sample huge number of receptor conformations and generated pharmacophore models from these conformations which showed improved enrichment for specific interaction features (Bottegoni et al, 2011;Wieder et al, 2016;Culletta et al, 2020). MD simulations combined with virtual screening of compound libraries have led to identification of biologically active compounds for several targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%