2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing methods for evaluating measurement uncertainty given in the JCGM ‘Evaluation of Measurement Data’ documents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The relevant formulas for b and w parameters appear in the Supplementary File. No sensitivity analysis for the present-day Cd-adsorption study is given here as we have only used three spiked concentrations and one sediment for our current purposes. However, we introduce an account of the propagated (combined) uncertainty, s, that goes with the retardation factor, R, as a function of the distribution coefficient, R(k d), with r/q ratio considered constant, and the column Péclet number as a function of longitudinal dispersivity, P(l), using the root of the sum of the squares method of the GUM approach (Bell, 2001 andStant et al., 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevant formulas for b and w parameters appear in the Supplementary File. No sensitivity analysis for the present-day Cd-adsorption study is given here as we have only used three spiked concentrations and one sediment for our current purposes. However, we introduce an account of the propagated (combined) uncertainty, s, that goes with the retardation factor, R, as a function of the distribution coefficient, R(k d), with r/q ratio considered constant, and the column Péclet number as a function of longitudinal dispersivity, P(l), using the root of the sum of the squares method of the GUM approach (Bell, 2001 andStant et al., 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevant formulas for  and  parameters appear in the Supplementary File. No sensitivity analysis for the present-day Cd-adsorption study is given here as we have only used three spiked concentrations and one sediment for our current purposes. However, we introduce an account of the propagated (combined) uncertainty, , that goes with the retardation factor, R, as a function of the distribution coefficient, R(k d), with / ratio considered constant, and the column Péclet number as a function of longitudinal dispersivity, P(), using the root of the sum of the squares method of the GUM approach (Bell, 2001 andStant et al., 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No sensitivity analysis for the present-day Cd-adsorption study is given here as we have only used three spiked concentrations and one sediment for our current purposes. However, we introduce an account of the propagated (combined) uncertainty, σ, that goes with the retardation factor, R, as a function of the distribution coefficient, R(k d), with ρ/θ ratio considered constant, and the column Péclet number as a function of longitudinal dispersivity, P(λ), using the root of the sum of the squares method of the GUM approach (Bell, 2001 andStant et al., 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%