Abstract:Purpose:The question of what type of utterance-a sustained vowel or continuous speech-is best for voice quality analysis has been extensively studied but with equivocal results. This study examines whether previously reported differences derive from the articulatory and prosodic factors occurring in continuous speech versus sustained phonation. Method: Speakers with voice disorders sustained vowels and read sentences. Vowel samples were excerpted from the steadiest portion of each vowel in the sentences. In ad… Show more
“…Secondly, the rating of the individual components of the perceptual voice quality (G, R, B, A, S, and I) may be tougher on a “static” vocal task (sustained vowel) unlike the revealing nature of connected speech. It has been shown that connected speech provides more apparent and dynamic signals than sustained vowel (related to the greater laryngeal muscular movement and the impact on the pitch, loudness, and tessitura), which remains more reliable to judge [10, 13, 33]. Interestingly, the recent paper of Gerratt et al [33] proposed that the perceptual differences between sustained vowel and continuous speech derived from the variability of voice source across segmental and prosodic contexts and not from variations of the vocal cord vibration in the quasi-steady portion of the vowel [21].…”
Objective: To study the differences in perceptual ratings of mild and moderate dysphonia related to the speech task, and their impact on intrarater and interrater reliabilities. Patients and Methods: Voice recordings of 15 outpatients with mild or moderate dysphonia related to laryngopharyngeal reflux were presented to 6 female experienced judges blinded to the clinical state of the patients. From these, the GRBASI (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain, and Instability) evaluations were performed on connected speech and sustained vowel of the pretreatment voice recordings and absolute agreement, and both intrarater and interrater reliabilities were assessed. Results: The average GRBASI scores were significantly worse when performed on sustained vowel. Intrarater reliability substantially varied according to the judge and the task. Good interrater reliability was broadly found for the evaluations of all GRBASI components irrespective of the speech task. Concerning agreement, we only found absolute agreement between judges for G and R items assessed on text. Conclusion: Average grade of perceptual voice impairment, intrarater reliability, and agreement vary according to the speech task.
“…Secondly, the rating of the individual components of the perceptual voice quality (G, R, B, A, S, and I) may be tougher on a “static” vocal task (sustained vowel) unlike the revealing nature of connected speech. It has been shown that connected speech provides more apparent and dynamic signals than sustained vowel (related to the greater laryngeal muscular movement and the impact on the pitch, loudness, and tessitura), which remains more reliable to judge [10, 13, 33]. Interestingly, the recent paper of Gerratt et al [33] proposed that the perceptual differences between sustained vowel and continuous speech derived from the variability of voice source across segmental and prosodic contexts and not from variations of the vocal cord vibration in the quasi-steady portion of the vowel [21].…”
Objective: To study the differences in perceptual ratings of mild and moderate dysphonia related to the speech task, and their impact on intrarater and interrater reliabilities. Patients and Methods: Voice recordings of 15 outpatients with mild or moderate dysphonia related to laryngopharyngeal reflux were presented to 6 female experienced judges blinded to the clinical state of the patients. From these, the GRBASI (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain, and Instability) evaluations were performed on connected speech and sustained vowel of the pretreatment voice recordings and absolute agreement, and both intrarater and interrater reliabilities were assessed. Results: The average GRBASI scores were significantly worse when performed on sustained vowel. Intrarater reliability substantially varied according to the judge and the task. Good interrater reliability was broadly found for the evaluations of all GRBASI components irrespective of the speech task. Concerning agreement, we only found absolute agreement between judges for G and R items assessed on text. Conclusion: Average grade of perceptual voice impairment, intrarater reliability, and agreement vary according to the speech task.
“…Running speech on the other hand commonly occurs in real life situations, i.e., it is a natural and ecologically valid signal that could serve as a basis for perceptual assessment and acoustic analysis [2]. Using running speech though is not as straightforward as using sustained vowels, since the voiced parts of speech are rather short, and the phonetic context of the vowels can affect objective voice quality measures [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several earlier studies have investigated how different perceptual or acoustic measures depend on the vowel context [3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gerratt et al [3] concluded that when analyzing or evaluating perceptually either sustained vowels or vowels excerpted from continuous speech, the information on deviation from normal voice quality was the same. The aim of the present study is to investigate how vowel context (sustained versus excerpted) affects the predictive power for dysphonia of two objective voice quality measures, i.e., the cepstral peak prominence smoothed (CPPS) and the sample entropy (SampEn).…”
This is the accepted version of a paper published in Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. This paper has been peer-reviewed but does not include the final publisher proofcorrections or journal pagination.
Objectives: Although it is well-known that the characteristics of sustained vowel and continuous speech are very different when evaluating voice problems, very little information has been reported on the aerodynamic aspects of these differences. The present study was performed to compare the aerodynamic characteristics of sustained vowel phonation and continuous speech production. Methods: Forty-three female patients with voice disorders produced a sustained vowel /a/ and continuous speech through paragraph reading, and their aerodynamic characteristics were analyzed using the 'Maximum Sustained Phonation' and 'Running Speech' programs of Phonatory Aerodynamic Systems (PAS). Results: There was no significant correlation between the sustained vowel and continuous speech in the time domain of the aerodynamic measurement results. However, there was a significant, but not high, correlation (r=-.521-.504) between the two speech tasks in the airflow rate and volume measurement results. Conclusion: We found that the correlation between the two tasks was significant, but not high. Therefore, in evaluating the aerodynamic characteristics of voice disorder patients, it is necessary to include continuous speech as well as a sustained vowel for meaningful and valid results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.