1996
DOI: 10.1109/51.482846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing maximum likelihood estimation and constrained Tikhonov-Miller restoration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The earliest work that used derivatives constructed the smoothness functional as the sum of squares of the image gradients (7). The main advantage in minimizing the sum of squares is that the cost can be expressed in Fourier space and the solution can be obtained in a single step.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earliest work that used derivatives constructed the smoothness functional as the sum of squares of the image gradients (7). The main advantage in minimizing the sum of squares is that the cost can be expressed in Fourier space and the solution can be obtained in a single step.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From previous experiments (van Kempen et al, 1996), we observed that the Richardson-Lucy algorithm is very sensitive to noise. We use a method that reduces this noise sensitivity by suppressing those parts of the image spectrum that do not contain any signal information (or where the noise contribution is far larger than the signal contribution).…”
Section: Restoration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In previous work (van Kempen et al, 1996) we have used the mean-square-error (MSE) and the I-divergence as performance measures. The MSE is given as…”
Section: Performance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations