2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Malmquist and Hicks–Moorsteen productivity indices: Exploring the impact of unbalanced vs. balanced panel data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could help management team detect any possible shortcoming in the system and provide possible solution strategies. The results of this survey are consistent with other existing works in the literature (Aparicio et al, 2013;Ahn & Min, 2014;Gharneh et al, 2014;Kerstens & Van de Woestyne, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could help management team detect any possible shortcoming in the system and provide possible solution strategies. The results of this survey are consistent with other existing works in the literature (Aparicio et al, 2013;Ahn & Min, 2014;Gharneh et al, 2014;Kerstens & Van de Woestyne, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…There are several applications of Malmquist productivity index (Aparicio et al, 2013;Kerstens & Van de Woestyne, 2014). Woo et al (2015) investigated the environmental efficiency of renewable energy from the static as well as the dynamic perspective in 31 OECD countries to learn more about the effect of renewable energy across countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, our study contributes to the more recent literature that has explored the use of alternative specifications to the Malmquist index for the evaluation of productivity change (see, among others, Epure et al, 2011;Kerstens and Van de Woestyne, 2014). Our second innovative contribution relates the evaluation of changes in the meta-technology, where we estimate the Divisia index not only at the country level but also at the supra-country level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Where necessary, the input quantity vector x * must be obtained by (numerically) solving the system of equations that emerges from the first order conditions for cost minimization, 47 See also Kerstens and Van de Woestyne (2014) for an activity analysis based comparison of the geometric mean input orientated Malmquist productivity index (76), and the geometric mean…”
Section: Appendix B: Computational Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%