2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-018-9889-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Likert Scale Functionality Across Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Groups in Science Education Research: an Illustration Using Qatari Students’ Responses to an Attitude Toward Science Survey

Abstract: Surveying is a common methodology in science education research, including cross-national and cross-cultural comparisons. The literature surrounding students' attitudes toward science, in particular, illustrates the prevalence of efforts to translate instruments with the eventual goal of comparing groups. This paper utilizes survey data from a nationally representative crosssectional study of Qatari students in grades 3 through 12 to frame a discussion around the adequacy and extent to which common adaptations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scale information section included seven latent variables. A Likert scale was used to quantify the latent variables, and it consisted of five levels: (1) strongly disagree, (2) disagree, (3) neither agree nor disagree, (4) agree, and (5) strongly agree [59]. Meanwhile, each observable variable was connected to a specific latent variable, which was based on the findings and recommendations of previous studies, as summarized in Table 3.…”
Section: Questionnaire Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale information section included seven latent variables. A Likert scale was used to quantify the latent variables, and it consisted of five levels: (1) strongly disagree, (2) disagree, (3) neither agree nor disagree, (4) agree, and (5) strongly agree [59]. Meanwhile, each observable variable was connected to a specific latent variable, which was based on the findings and recommendations of previous studies, as summarized in Table 3.…”
Section: Questionnaire Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MT psychosocial risk assessment test has a Likert rating scale (Summers, Wang, Abd-El-Khalick, & Said, 2019) represented as follows: disagree = 1, slightly agree = 2, partially agree = 3, completely agree = 4.…”
Section: Mt Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (-1); neutral (0); agree (1); strongly agree (2) 16 . This questionnaire aims to capture the judges' perception of the following aspects:…”
Section: Mannequin Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%