Comparing life cycle implications of building retrofit and replacement options

Abstract

When is it better to retrofit a building as opposed to demolishing and rebuilding it? Life cycle environmental and economic analyses are used to address this question through the study of a typical four bedroom detached house in Toronto. Three vintages of the reference house are used: 1930s solid masonry; 1960s wood frame; and post oil crisis, 1980s wood frame. Retrofit studies considered include insulating the attic and basement walls and air leakage sealing. Over a 40-year life cycle, the rebuild option has lower life cycle energy, global warming potential, and air pollution, which are predominantly associated with building operation. But the retrofit options have lower water pollution, solid waste generation, and weighted resource use, associated with material flows. The retrofit options also have lower life cycle economic costs than rebuilding. In this respect, the preferred options are basement plus air leakage sealing retrofit for the 1930s house, basement retrofit for the 1960s house, and no change for 1980s house. There are ways to overcome the trade-off in negative environmental impacts between retrofitting and rebuilding, such as use of renewable energy sources or re-use and recycling of deconstruction and demolition materials in new construction.Key words: life cycle assessment, life cycle costing, building retrofits, sustainable development.

Sustainability or Bust: Malaysian Home Buyers’ Stated Preferences for Sus-Tainable Housing

“…Unlike buying a new home, more factors need to be taken into account in sustainable retrofitting works [30], thus would require a different approach compared to the relative genericisation of the home buying process used in this study.…”

Two-Stage Integer Programing Model for Building Retrofit Planning for Energy Saving in South Korea

“…As per the result of insulation material selection, CO 2 emissions decreased by 30% and the total energy usage amount also decreased by 20%. Dong et al [19] considered the environmental impact and economics simultaneously to decide on proper action between applying the retrofit and reconstruction. The analysis of the effects of a single retrofit was also one of the most popular research topics such as the effects of replacing windows (either external or internal), the use of green roofs, the selection of internal walls, or the selection of ventilation methods [20][21][22][23][24].…”

“…In general, the cost is proportional to the size of the construction unit as shown in Equation (19). …”

Structural and Durability Analysis of a Novel Re-Roofing Concept

“…The concerns relating to the durability of lowslope roof assemblies and management of replacement and/or repairs has been studied greatly (Rudbeck 2001;Lounis, Vanier 2000;Xing, Taylor 2011;Marques et al 2011;Choi et al 2012;Dong et al 2005;Costello 2011). Hygrothermal analysis of new roofing strategies is essential.…”