2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing L- and C-band synthetic aperture radar estimates of sea ice motion over different ice regimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the backscatter coefficient of SAR is sensitive to the surface roughness larger than the wavelength [18] and the wavelength of L-band SAR is close to the surface roughness of deformed ice in the SIZ. The capability of L-band SAR for detecting ice features compared with C-band SAR was confirmed not limited to the midwinter season, but also during the melt season [19], [20]. In fact, the capability of L-band SAR for extracting ridged ice had already been shown for the Beaufort Sea ice at the very early stage of the SAR history [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This is because the backscatter coefficient of SAR is sensitive to the surface roughness larger than the wavelength [18] and the wavelength of L-band SAR is close to the surface roughness of deformed ice in the SIZ. The capability of L-band SAR for detecting ice features compared with C-band SAR was confirmed not limited to the midwinter season, but also during the melt season [19], [20]. In fact, the capability of L-band SAR for extracting ridged ice had already been shown for the Beaufort Sea ice at the very early stage of the SAR history [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Several of these products were intercompared in Sumata et al (2014Sumata et al ( , 2015. High-resolution synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) imagery has also been used to track motion at much finer spatial scales (e.g., Curlander et al, 1985;Kwok et al, 2003;Howell et al, 2018). While high resolution, SAR has had limited spatial and temporal coverage, the data were large and difficult to work with, and reasonable coverage did not start until the mid-1990s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects for Sentinel-1 are the same for all the images, but the degradation of the ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 is more random and not always pronounced. Howell and others (2018) report problems with the cross-polarization channel though they do not give further details. Here it should be kept in mind that ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 is designed for land observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%