2014
DOI: 10.15446/abc.v20n2.43130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COMPARING INOCULATION METHODS TO EVALUATE THE GROWTH OF Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. manihotis ON CASSAVA PLANTS

Abstract: <p class="ecxmsonormal"><em>Xanthomonas axonopodis </em>pv. manihotis (<em>Xam</em>) is the causal agent of cassava bacterial blight (CBB), a major disease for cassava crops in South America and Africa. Until now the development of the disease is measured via AUDPC (Area Under Disease Progress Curve) but no reliable quantitative methods are available probably due to high variability of bacterial growth <em>in planta</em>. To establish an accurate method for bacterial q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leaf inoculation may be questionable for resistance phenotyping because discrepancies were observed between leaf lesion measurements and scoring on stem inoculation (Muñoz‐Bodnar et al, 2015 ; Restrepo et al, 2000a ). However, others have successfully detected symptom differences when infiltrating leaves of susceptible and resistant cultivars at low densities (from 10 2 to 10 5 cfu/ml; Flood et al, 1995 ; Wydra et al, 2004 , 2007 ).…”
Section: Disease Phenotyping Tools Under Controlled Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaf inoculation may be questionable for resistance phenotyping because discrepancies were observed between leaf lesion measurements and scoring on stem inoculation (Muñoz‐Bodnar et al, 2015 ; Restrepo et al, 2000a ). However, others have successfully detected symptom differences when infiltrating leaves of susceptible and resistant cultivars at low densities (from 10 2 to 10 5 cfu/ml; Flood et al, 1995 ; Wydra et al, 2004 , 2007 ).…”
Section: Disease Phenotyping Tools Under Controlled Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%