1996
DOI: 10.1037/1076-898x.2.2.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing implicit and explicit memory for brand names from advertisements.

Abstract: Researchers examined the implicit-explicit memory distinction in the domain of brand-name memory from advertisements. The distinctions were tested in 2 experiments that assessed effects of word frequency of the brand name, type of processing, and repetition on tasks reflecting implicit and explicit memory. Results showed that high-frequency brand names perform better on indirect tests. Moreover, priming effects emerged only when the brand names were the focus of attention at advertising exposure. Repetition le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
1
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
53
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A systematic cataloging of these relationships would most likely produce interesting theoretical insights (e.g., scales for measuring design properties) as well as practical marketing tools for product assessment and product development research. This could also be undertaken at the brand level in order to determine the relationship between particular expedient constellations and memory for brands (e.g., Krishnan & Shapiro, 1996). In addition, the structures of design properties (NA-IPAs) need to be explored and further delineated.…”
Section: Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic cataloging of these relationships would most likely produce interesting theoretical insights (e.g., scales for measuring design properties) as well as practical marketing tools for product assessment and product development research. This could also be undertaken at the brand level in order to determine the relationship between particular expedient constellations and memory for brands (e.g., Krishnan & Shapiro, 1996). In addition, the structures of design properties (NA-IPAs) need to be explored and further delineated.…”
Section: Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies show that effects on brand choice are not mediated by brand memory and that both implicit and explicit learning are affected by brand placements. Implicit learning, on the one hand, refers to situations in which people learn without consciously remembering the learning situation (Krishnan & Shapiro, 1996;Schacter, 1987); for example, they do not recall or recognize the brand as being placed in the program. Explicit learning, on the other hand, occurs when people are aware of the learning situation and memorize that situation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En marketing, l'étude des effets d'une exposition incidente à la publicité ou de la perception subliminale concerne l'étude de communications encodées inconsciemment (Droulers, 2000 ;Grégory, 1993 ;Janiszewski, 1993). L'étude de la mémorisation implicite de publicités concerne le plus souvent l'étude de l'effet inconscient de communications encodées consciemment (Krishnan et Shapiro, 1996 ;Shapiro et Krishnan, 2001). Il semble que c'est ce deuxième type d'étude qui est particulièrement prometteur en marketing.…”
Section: Effets Inconscients Des Communications Persuasivesunclassified