1995
DOI: 10.1177/183335839502500305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Classification Systems in a Primary Health Care Setting: Some Initial Observations

Abstract: The ICD-10 is due to be introduced into Australia during the late 1990s, superseding the current and widely used ICD-9-CM. Improvements in areas such as number of codes, an expanded external cause framework, and more context to injuries are expected to make the ICD-10 a more streamlined system for practitioners. The present study examined both classification formats using data from 1183 presentations to primary health clinics at island tourist resorts. Some initial observations are made about differences in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since some travel insurance policies specifically exclude cover for certain activities such as horse riding and motor cycling, further research on the nature of all transport accidents would be of benefit to insurance companies and health service providers. In this area, the ICD-10 diagnostic coding framework (World Health Organization 1992) has recently been shown to offer greater detail than the ICD-9-CM (Walker et al 1995b). Again, the use of a standard classification system across studies would greatly enhance the comparison of research findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since some travel insurance policies specifically exclude cover for certain activities such as horse riding and motor cycling, further research on the nature of all transport accidents would be of benefit to insurance companies and health service providers. In this area, the ICD-10 diagnostic coding framework (World Health Organization 1992) has recently been shown to offer greater detail than the ICD-9-CM (Walker et al 1995b). Again, the use of a standard classification system across studies would greatly enhance the comparison of research findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements in areas such as number of codes and an expanded external cause framework are expected to make the ICD-10 a more streamlined system. 10,11 Stroke definitions are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is certainly the fact that the degree of detail varies in different studies, a graver problem is that it is not always clear which framework of case classification has been used. The most widely used ICD-9-CM has been tested in a tourist health context by Walker et al (1995) against the newer ICD-10 system, which does provide more detail and, if applied globally, will allow the production of data which are more valid and reliable. Nevertheless, consulting currently available information reveals that tourists are at a considerable risk of being harmed by environmental factors.…”
Section: Tourist Health Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%