2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing heat flow models for interpretation of precast quadratic pile heat exchanger thermal response tests

Abstract: This paper investigates the applicability of currently available analytical, empirical and numerical heat flow models for interpreting thermal response tests (TRT) of quadratic cross section precast pile heat exchangers. A 3D finite element model (FEM) is utilised for interpreting five TRTs by inverse modelling. The calibrated estimates of soil and concrete thermal conductivity are consistent with independent laboratory measurements. Due to the computational cost of inverting the 3D model, simpler models are u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Guidance based on the The pile G-function approach with lower bounds performs similarly to the ILSM in terms of accuracy but does this from assessment of the early time transient data. It gives a slight underestimation of λ g , which is consistent with another test on smaller energy piles by Alberdi-Pagola et al [36], but most importantly gives good results from fitting to the early time, even for the region of Fo1-5. The G-function approach explicitly treats the pile and ground thermal conductivity separately and models the early time transient behavior.…”
Section: Alternative Determination Of Thermal Resistancesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Guidance based on the The pile G-function approach with lower bounds performs similarly to the ILSM in terms of accuracy but does this from assessment of the early time transient data. It gives a slight underestimation of λ g , which is consistent with another test on smaller energy piles by Alberdi-Pagola et al [36], but most importantly gives good results from fitting to the early time, even for the region of Fo1-5. The G-function approach explicitly treats the pile and ground thermal conductivity separately and models the early time transient behavior.…”
Section: Alternative Determination Of Thermal Resistancesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Research has been carried out to try and assess this using field data [20,34] and numerical studies [35]. Approaches have included looking at the required test duration [36] as well as whether alternative interpretation methods would be more appropriate [20]. Where a line source method is used in interpretation there is a potential for systematic overestimation of the thermal conductivity [30] and this is observed in many field studies [22,37,38].…”
Section: In-situ Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The soil thermal conductivity λ s and volumetric heat capacity pc s at Rosborg Gymnasium were estimated in [21] by means of thermal response testing (TRT) and transient plane heat source measurements on soil samples (Figure 2b). The upper 1 m of silty sand has a thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity of ca.…”
Section: Study Site and Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%