2015
DOI: 10.1681/asn.2014060607
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing GFR Estimating Equations Using Cystatin C and Creatinine in Elderly Individuals

Abstract: Current guidelines recommend reporting eGFR using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations unless other equations are more accurate, and recommend the combination of creatinine and cystatin C (eGFRcr-cys) as more accurate than either eGFRcr or eGFRcys alone. However, preferred equations and filtration markers in elderly individuals are debated. In 805 adults enrolled in the community-based Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility (AGES)-Reykjavik Study, we measured GFR (mGFR) using… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
117
7
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
12
117
7
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of creatinine and Cys-C (eGFRcrcys) has been suggested to provide more precise GFR estimates than creatinine alone (20), even in elderly individuals (21). Using the eGFRcr-cys equation to estimate GFR in the present PHPT series, CKD was diagnosed in 13.7% of patients, which is higher than that diagnosed by the eGFR based on creatinine alone (10.8%).…”
Section: European Journal Of Endocrinologymentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The combination of creatinine and Cys-C (eGFRcrcys) has been suggested to provide more precise GFR estimates than creatinine alone (20), even in elderly individuals (21). Using the eGFRcr-cys equation to estimate GFR in the present PHPT series, CKD was diagnosed in 13.7% of patients, which is higher than that diagnosed by the eGFR based on creatinine alone (10.8%).…”
Section: European Journal Of Endocrinologymentioning
confidence: 67%
“…1). Other studies (11 ), including a prior report from the Mayo Clinic group (12 ), generally show better precision for eGFR Cr-Cys than either eGFR Cr or eGFR Cys . Both bias and imprecision contribute to the overall accuracy of individual GFR estimates (13 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The ACR was calculated from values measured by the Mount Sinai Medical Center laboratory. eGFR was determined using the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration cystatin C-creatinine equation (20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Blood and Urine Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%