1999
DOI: 10.1559/152304099782294186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Geometrical Properties of Global Grids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where ∈ [4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32], and and are the meridional length and zonal length of the component's minimum bounding rectangle (MBR) (see Figure 2). Taking into account what is required to apply the identification code of the city component, we adopted only the 4th, 8th, 12nd, 16th, 20th, 24th, 28th, and 32nd level grids of GeoSOT for location reference.…”
Section: Identification Code Of the City Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where ∈ [4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32], and and are the meridional length and zonal length of the component's minimum bounding rectangle (MBR) (see Figure 2). Taking into account what is required to apply the identification code of the city component, we adopted only the 4th, 8th, 12nd, 16th, 20th, 24th, 28th, and 32nd level grids of GeoSOT for location reference.…”
Section: Identification Code Of the City Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where n ∈ [4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32], and L MBR and W MBR are the meridional length and zonal length of the component's minimum bounding rectangle (MBR) (see Figure 2). at the optimum grid level is .…”
Section: Identification Code Of the City Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The provably optimal solution to all of these formulations is to arrange the fixed points as the center points of a hexagonal lattice (Rogers, 1964;Conway & Sloane, 2010). While it is difficult to extend this reasoning analytically to the sphere, studies by mathematicians (Saff & Kuijlaars, 1997) and GIS researchers (Kimerling, et al, 1999) both conclude that a hexagonal distribution has the highest International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XL-4/W2, 2013ISPRS WebMGS 2013& DMGIS 2013 November 2013, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China Topics: Global Spatial Grid & Cloud-based Services degree of geometric regularity. On the plane a hexagonal distribution is the best known for estimating continuous spatial functions using kriging (Olea, 1984), and such a distribution is 13.4% more efficient than a square distribution of equivalent precision at sampling circularly bandlimited signals (Petersen & Middleton, 1962).…”
Section: The Limitations Of Fixed-width Floating Point Vector Locatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Snyder gives an equal-area projection method and relative transferring formulas (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17), which can be used for transferring polyhedron cells onto sphere surface [Snyder 1992]. In this method, three conditions should be fulfilled.…”
Section: B Snyder Projectionmentioning
confidence: 99%