Comparing formal and informal social protection: a case study exploring the usefulness of informal social protection in Pakistan

Abstract

In most global south countries, various informal institutions provide welfare to a large segment of the neglected, poor and vulnerable populations through informal social protection. Despite being a major source of welfare in the global south, the usefulness of informal social protection at the household level remains an under-researched area. In this exploratory study, we have determined the usefulness of informal social protection provided through religious institutions, such as madrassas and compared it with formal social protection at the household level utilising the case study of a lower-income country such as Pakistan. A mixed methodology of data collection comprising a survey and semi-structured interviews in 14 different cities of Pakistan of the poor and eligible households for receiving formal social protection was conducted for the research. The results suggest the coverage of informal social protection provided by madrassas is greater than formal social protection. The poor and vulnerable population value and considers it more useful than formal social protection. We conclude that integrating informal and formal social protection would help improve the effectiveness of social policies in developing and less developed countries.

Everyday governance in areas of contested power: Insights from Mozambique, Myanmar, and Pakistan

“…We use self-provision as a broad category for situations where solutions are found without the central involvement of external authorities or official duty-bearers, and outside the boundaries of any existing public services. 10 We saw self-provision of different kinds, including those discussed in the literature on forms of informal social protection (Getu & Devereux, 2013;Mumtaz, 2022;Mumtaz & Whiteford, 2021). These included institutions like burial societies and savings groups, but also customs of wealthier people making donations or using their influence to help those who were struggling to access services or support.…”

Editors’ introduction: 10 years of the Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy (2013–2022) – taking stock and charting a route forward

“…In turn, besides applying critical conceptual and theoretical tools within international/global social policy (see e.g. Cook & Staab, 2022; Lendvai-Bainton & Stubbs, 2022), comparative social policy in the post Covid-19 era can also find inspiration in innovative methodological approaches within international/global social policy research in investment and systematically mixing across epistemologies and units of analysis (Mumtaz & Whiteford, 2021).…”

The clandestine welfare: The role of illicit actors in the provision of social protection in Latin America

“…Similarly, radical and fundamentalist groups in Pakistan have used Madrassas (religious schools) to develop a safety net for a large segment of the country’s poor population that provides not only education but also housing, health assistance, and financial aid (Abbas and Syed, 2021; Mumtaz and Whiteford, 2021). It could be argued that despite many Madrassas are not regulated by the government, they do not represent clandestine or parallel forms of governance but informal welfare mechanisms since they are communitarian actors with a genuine interest in providing social support (Mumtaz and Whiteford, 2021). However, as suggested by Singer (2001), some of these can be funded and used by illicit actors (i.e., terrorist groups) as a mechanism to expand their influence and gain militants to continue their criminal activity.…”