2017
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2017.1281601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing focus groups and individual interviews: findings from a randomized study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
224
0
8

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 365 publications
(266 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
224
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The data were analysed thematically (Vaismoradi, Jones, Turunen, & Snelgrove, ). The data collected from the training participants and their superiors were initially separately analysed to form an understanding of the participants' diverse perceptions and experiences about the interview themes (Guest et al, ). Subsequently, the data were analysed as a whole.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data were analysed thematically (Vaismoradi, Jones, Turunen, & Snelgrove, ). The data collected from the training participants and their superiors were initially separately analysed to form an understanding of the participants' diverse perceptions and experiences about the interview themes (Guest et al, ). Subsequently, the data were analysed as a whole.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The job titles of the nurse leaders and their superiors included Nurse Managers, Nurse Directors and Senior Nurse Directors. Study participants were interviewed twice individually and with focus groups (Guest, Namey, Taylor, Eley, & McKenna, ). In the initial phase of the training (2015), 19 training participants were individually interviewed and 11 of their superiors participated in four focus group interviews.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, focus groups allowed for the elaboration of processes of resettlement, change and adjustment among participants. Previous research has also showed that focus groups can facilitate the disclosure of sensitive information (Guest, Namey, Taylor, Eley, & McKenna, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsological Approach and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focus groups were chosen because this approach encourages all participants to express their opinions (Morgan, 1997). As opposed to individual interviews, focus groups tend to generate more sensitive and personal disclosures for health-related topics (Guest, Namey, Taylor, Eley, & McKenna, 2017); practically, as smoking is forbidden in schools, school-based individual interviews on smoking topics might resemble interrogation (especially for students who smoke) which may further discourage free discussion (Zhao et al, 2017). Triangulating data from different sources is especially important for our research as smoking at school is banned and participants might be reluctant to state their opinions due to this school policy.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%