2014
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing focal and global responses on multifocal electroretinogram with retinal nerve fibre layer thickness by spectral domain optical coherence tomography in glaucoma

Abstract: Of all responses on mfERG, P1N2 amplitude correlates well with RNFL-FC and RNFL-ST on SD-OCT and can be used for monitoring early and moderate glaucoma. Diffuse structural changes may best be reflected by changes in P1N2 implicit time owing to ceiling effect of the amplitude in all regions in severe glaucoma.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose Multifocal ERG over pattern ERG to detect multiple local retinal responses as the latter does not provide the measure of pathological changes in localized retinal areas. [ 19 20 21 ] Assessment of these parameters was performed at baseline before starting therapy, at 3 months and 1 year of starting therapy (9 months of cessation of VPA, to look for a legacy effect of the drug). Liver function tests were measured before starting VPA and at 3 rd month.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose Multifocal ERG over pattern ERG to detect multiple local retinal responses as the latter does not provide the measure of pathological changes in localized retinal areas. [ 19 20 21 ] Assessment of these parameters was performed at baseline before starting therapy, at 3 months and 1 year of starting therapy (9 months of cessation of VPA, to look for a legacy effect of the drug). Liver function tests were measured before starting VPA and at 3 rd month.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multifocal ERG (mfERG) measures responses from multiple retinal locations from a single recording. [ 50 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 ] It is primarily generated by the photoreceptor and bipolar cells of the retina. The stimulus in mfERG constitutes an array of either 61 or 103 white and black hexagons alternating in a semi-random sequence with the fixation target located at the center (Fig.…”
Section: Tests For Assessing Ganglion Cell Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure–function analysis can be enhanced in glaucoma when mfERG test is combined with OCT and SAP. [ 74 75 ] Moon et al . [ 72 ] studied the relationship between visual field defects and mfERG optic nerve head component (ONHC) in 39 glaucoma patients and 30 healthy controls.…”
Section: Tests For Assessing Ganglion Cell Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In combination with the topographic map of retinal functions enabled by the multifocal setting, multifocal Pattern ERG suggests a benefit in the assessment of glaucoma patients (Harrison et al, 2006;Stiefelmeyer, Neubauer, Berninger, Arden, & Rudolph, 2004). Reduced amplitudes are associated with visual field defects as well as nerve fiber layer thickness and can even be found before manifest glaucoma occurs (Bach, 2001;Bach & Hoffmann, 2008;Bach & Poloschek, 2013;Bach et al, 2006;Rao, Singh, Mukherjee, & Chowdhury, 2015). Various modifications of the mfERG stimulation such as fast flicker, low contrast, slow sequence, global flash, two flash, and luminance modulation have been developed in recent years in order to improve validity and effectiveness in the diagnosis of glaucoma (Chan, 2005;Chu, Chan, & Brown, 2006Chu et al, 2012;Kramer et al, 2013;Ledolter, Monhart, Schoetzau, Todorova, & Palmowski-Wolfe, 2015;Palmowski-Wolfe, Allgayer, Vernaleken, Schötzau, & Ruprecht, 2006;Palmowski-Wolfe, Todorova, Orguel, Flammer, & Brigell, 2007).…”
Section: Clinical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%