2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2011.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing equivalent thermal, high pressure and pulsed electric field processes for mild pasteurization of orange juice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
92
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
3
92
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It was observed in general that PME activity decreased with storage period in all ALMB samples. A similar observation has been previously reported by Vervoort et al (2011) for orange juice. The residual PME activity of HPP treated ALMB samples stored at different temperatures varied from 66 to 33 %, whereas, for TP treated samples it ranged between 22 and 8 %.…”
Section: Pectinmethylesterase Activitysupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was observed in general that PME activity decreased with storage period in all ALMB samples. A similar observation has been previously reported by Vervoort et al (2011) for orange juice. The residual PME activity of HPP treated ALMB samples stored at different temperatures varied from 66 to 33 %, whereas, for TP treated samples it ranged between 22 and 8 %.…”
Section: Pectinmethylesterase Activitysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The presence of POD activity in fruit based products is not desirable as it leads to the oxidative reactions affecting its natural flavour and aroma (Vervoort et al 2011). In the present study, it was witnessed that HPP could not completely inactivate the POD activity.…”
Section: Peroxidase Activitymentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are in agreement with Hyoung and Coates (2003), Lee and Coates (2003), Cortes et al, (2006), Esteve et al, (2009) who also noticed a significant processing effect. Some authors, nevertheless, have reported that processing had no significant effect on the carotenoid profile (Lee and Coates, 2003;Vervoort et al, 2011). Also, there were no significant changes after thermal treatment in a study by Sanchez-Moreno et al (2005), after HPP treatment by Donsi et al (1996) and Esteve et al (2009) Ultra-High Temperature processed 6.1 6.2 * Consumer Acceptance Testing (n = 14); 9 point hedonic scale-9 = like extremely; 8 = like very much; 7 = like moderately; 6 = like slightly; 5 = neither like nor dislike; 4 = dislike slightly; 3 = dislike moderately; 2 = dislike very much; and 1 = dislike extremely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Se empleó el diseño experimental Completamente al Azar y se aplicó el Análisis de Varianza (ANDE-VA) seguido de la prueba de Rangos Múltiples (LSD de Fisher) a los resultados obtenidos para verificar si hubo diferencias significativas (P<0,05) en la concentración de compuestos bioactivos en la bebida mixta durante el tiempo de almacenamiento. Vervoort et al (2011), encontrando que los sólidos solubles totales y el pH se mantuvieron prácticamente constantes a lo largo del tiempo de almacenamiento a 4°C en bebidas de leche con jugos de frutas (naranja, kiwi, mango y piña) y en jugo de naranja.…”
Section: Materiales Y Métodosunclassified