2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00779-005-0019-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing end-user and intelligent remote control interface generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A promising direction that we intend to explore is a usage-based aggregate interface, perhaps based on the ideas of Omojokun et al [10]. We are also interested in combining a usage-based aggregate with information about the user's context to provide the right function at the right time.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A promising direction that we intend to explore is a usage-based aggregate interface, perhaps based on the ideas of Omojokun et al [10]. We are also interested in combining a usage-based aggregate with information about the user's context to provide the right function at the right time.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Omojokun et al [10] have examined how remote control interfaces for a system of appliances might be generated from recordings of actual usage. Remote control usage was recorded by an IR receiver that was placed near the home theaters of several users, and the information gathered by the IR receiver was used to generate button-only interfaces.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Omojokun et al [Omojokun 2005] have collected usage data for consumer electronics in real home settings and applied a machine learning approach to discover the core set of functionality that is used by a particular user and to cluster these functions into task groups. They compared their automatic results to their users' intuition and discovered that neither approach was sufficient for building a complete user interface.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former choice is clearly impossible, or at least very costly, while the latter would be a waste of network connectivity resources. However, the user experience would be more appropriate if single UI device would suffice to operate all targets, despite platform and vendor differences in targets and UI devices themselves [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%