2023
DOI: 10.1002/ppap.202300031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing efficiencies of polypropylene treatment by atmospheric pressure plasma jets

Abstract: Plasma treatment of polypropylene (PP) is a well‐established method of improving its surface properties. However, the efficiencies of different plasma discharges are seldom compared. Herein, we discuss the differences in PP treated by three arc‐based commercial plasma jets working in dry air, Plasmatreat rotating plasma jet (PT‐RPJ), AFS PlasmaJet® (AFS‐PJ), and SurfaceTreat gliding arc jet (ST‐GA), and by the low‐temperature RF plasma slit jet (RF‐PSJ) working in argon. The AFS‐PJ has a significantly differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface resistance of the untreated samples of the second series of materials was Rp,tset = 0.082 TΩ, and Rp,tplast = 0.092 TΩ. According to the previously performed experiments (from 1996 until now [4,7,9,10,35,36,45,46]), the parameters (Figure 11) of the electric power of the exciting slot nozzle of the plasma discharge in gases, for example, were obtained based on experiments with Ar, N2, etc. to effectively influence the surface.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The surface resistance of the untreated samples of the second series of materials was Rp,tset = 0.082 TΩ, and Rp,tplast = 0.092 TΩ. According to the previously performed experiments (from 1996 until now [4,7,9,10,35,36,45,46]), the parameters (Figure 11) of the electric power of the exciting slot nozzle of the plasma discharge in gases, for example, were obtained based on experiments with Ar, N2, etc. to effectively influence the surface.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expected bonds are those that are potentially able to bind an electric charge, and this results in a macroscopic increase in the interfacial strength of the modified surface, Ep. This hypothesis has already been investigated and tested in other areas of electrochemistry [45,46]. Therefore, the authors attempted to verify it by measurements, whether a change in surface strength properties could also be expected.…”
Section: Methods Of Adjusting the Electrical Strength Of Dielectrics:...mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations