2019
DOI: 10.1111/disa.12371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing earthquake insurance programmes: how would Japan and California have fared after the 2010–11 earthquakes in New Zealand?

Abstract: Earthquakes are insured in high‐risk high‐income countries only if the public sector is involved. Prototypical examples are the insurance schemes in California (United States), Japan, and New Zealand, but each is structured differently. This paper examines these variations using a concrete case study: the sequence of earthquakes in Christchurch, New Zealand, in 2010–11—the most heavily insured seismic event in history. It assesses what would have been the outcome had the Christchurch insurance system been diff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This unbundling would have wide-ranging implications for the local insurance market. Without an all-hazards insurance system, it is likely that the current exceptionally high levels of residential insurance for natural hazards will be difficult to maintain, and that will have consequences for the outcomes after disasters (Nguyen and Noy 2020). This is especially important as this specific-hazard retreat will almost certainly exclude the very hazard(s) that pose the greatest threat to the property.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This unbundling would have wide-ranging implications for the local insurance market. Without an all-hazards insurance system, it is likely that the current exceptionally high levels of residential insurance for natural hazards will be difficult to maintain, and that will have consequences for the outcomes after disasters (Nguyen and Noy 2020). This is especially important as this specific-hazard retreat will almost certainly exclude the very hazard(s) that pose the greatest threat to the property.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mandatory characteristic of natural hazard insurance in New Zealand allows us to investigate its impact without this selection bias, and indeed a few papers have already examined the role of insurance in economic recovery more broadly in New Zealand Nguyen andNoy 2020a) used change in nightlights to measure the economic recovery of households, while Poontirakul et al 2017 relied on surveyed responses from firm managers to examine how firms fared in the aftermath of the Christchurch earthquake. No paper, as far as we know, has investigated directly the role of insurance (or other forms of compensation/assistance) in post-disaster housing markets, in New Zealand, or elsewhere.…”
Section: The Literature and The Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, even in high-income high-insurance-penetration countries like the United States, many hazard risks are underinsured. For example, fewer than 13% of homes are covered for earthquakes in earthquake-prone California (Nguyen & Noy, 2020), and only about 30% of homeowners in the city of Houston were insured when their homes were flooded by Hurricane Harvey in 2017 (Smiley et al, 2021). This insurance gap is not a uniquely American phenomenon; indeed, it is true globally for practically any catastrophic natural hazard that is not insured by a mandatory public insurance scheme.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%