Comparing domain- and facet-level relations of the HEXACO personality model with workplace deviance: A meta-analysis

Abstract

General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Depletion of psychological, financial, and social resources in the hospitality sector during the pandemic

“…Third, this paper measures psychological problems in the business domain and goes beyond the routine inquiry on those phenomena in the life sciences and psychology domain. Though earlier studies have explicated the construct of unemployment and aspects of social disconnectedness separately from a leadership perspective ( Gill et al, 2016 ; Haider et al, 2018 ) and personality traits ( Pletzer et al, 2020 ), none has broadly captured both complex constructs from the psychological, attitudinal, and behavioral standpoint. Fourth, the authors explored individual responses to social disconnectedness and perceived risk of unemployment during the Covid-19 pandemic in an integrative way and developed an integrative and holistic mechanism for interpersonal deviance; such studies are still in their infancy.…”

“…Notably, interpersonal deviance includes verbal abuse, harassment, physical assault, showing favoritism, and backstabbing ( Bennett and Robinson, 2000 ). Previous studies of interpersonal deviance have used leadership approaches ( Gill et al, 2016 ; Haider et al, 2018 ) and personality traits ( Pletzer et al, 2020 ), More research on psychological factors could better inform interventions needed to mitigate interpersonal deviance among employees. Recently, Malik and Lenka (2019) contended that interpersonal deviance is not a result of any single predictor/variable or personality trait; instead, other variables contribute.…”

“…Hence, it is a valuable addition to the literature, particularly on COR, because it explains how resource depletion in employees leads to interpersonal deviance. Previous studies have examined leadership ( Gill et al, 2016 ; Haider et al, 2018 ; Markova, 2018 ) and personality traits ( Pletzer et al, 2020 ; Tenzer and Yang, 2019 ) in elaborating interpersonal deviance. However, our study focuses on predictors of interpersonal deviance using psychological factors.…”

Getting along And/Or Getting Ahead: Differential Hexaco Personality Correlates of Likeability and Popularity among Adolescents

“…In comparisons between the HEXACO model and the Big Five/FFM model, the HEXACO model—through its addition of honesty‐humility—has been found to outperform the Big Five/FFM model in the prediction of psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism (i.e. the Dark Triad; Paulhus & Williams, ; Lee & Ashton, , ), egoism (De Vries, De Vries, De Hoogh, & Feij, ), unethical business decisions (Ashton & Lee, ), and counterproductive work behaviours (Pletzer, Bentvelzen, Oostrom, & De Vries, ; Pletzer, Oostrom, Bentvelzen, & De Vries, ). In research on the relations between HEXACO personality and antisocial/aggressive behaviours, HEXACO honesty‐humility was typically found to be the best (negative) predictor of adolescent bullying (Provenzano, Dane, Farrell, Marini, & Volk, ; Volk, Provenzano, Farrell, Dane, & Shulman, ; Volk, Schiralli, Xia, Zhao, & Dane, ), proactive aggression (Book, Visser, Volk, Holden, & D'Agata, ; Dinić & Wertag, ; Sokolovska, Dinić, & Tomašević, ), relational aggression (Knight, Dahlen, Bullock‐Yowell, & Madson, ), antisocial behaviours at school (Allgaier et al, ), and sadism (Plouffe, Saklofske, & Smith, ).…”

The manifestation of the 10 personality aspects amongst the facets of the Basic Traits Inventory

“…However, there is a continuing debate regarding the predictive validity of the five broad traits versus their constituent personality facets (see Figure 1) for job performance (Judge, Rodell, Klinger, Simon, & Crawford, 2013). Some argue that the five broad traits are more robust predictors of job performance (Barrick & Mount, 2005;Ones, Viswesvaran, & Dilchert, 2005), whereas others argue each broad trait's facets enable researchers and practitioners to better exploit predictive validity at specific levels of job performance (Anglim & Grant, 2014;Pletzer, Oostrom, Bentvelzen, & De Vries, 2020;Tett, Steele, & Beauregard, 2003). Cronbach and Gleser (1965) captured an important aspect of this debate by referring to it as the bandwidth-fidelity dilemma where '…there is some ideal compromise between a variety of information (bandwidth) and thoroughness of testing to obtain more certain information (fidelity)' (p. 100).…”