2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing different post-mortem human samples as DNA sources for downstream genotyping and identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(1 reference statement)
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the manufacturer, even 22-year-old blood samples can yield short tandem repeat (STR) profiles commonly generated in forensic genetics [14]. However, most of these studies evaluated fresh blood samples which are applied immediately on the FTA cards, although other sample types also have been reported [11,[15][16][17]. Many of these studies have targeted forensically-relevant STR markers [18,19] or single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) [20], and only few studies report the results from genome wide association studies [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the manufacturer, even 22-year-old blood samples can yield short tandem repeat (STR) profiles commonly generated in forensic genetics [14]. However, most of these studies evaluated fresh blood samples which are applied immediately on the FTA cards, although other sample types also have been reported [11,[15][16][17]. Many of these studies have targeted forensically-relevant STR markers [18,19] or single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) [20], and only few studies report the results from genome wide association studies [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When generating DNA IDs from mass disaster, forensic casework, and mass graves, it is imperative to assess each set of remains to determine the optimal types of samples to process [5,22]. Temperature, moisture, and oxygen levels in the depositional environment, soil composition, and pH affect the ability to obtain analyzable DNA from biological specimens [23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the previous studies exhibited very good amplification on the femur bone. [ 8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As molecular genomic analysis has been limited to long bones of the body and teeth in jaws, our study highlights the use of the STR CODIS to the jaw bone where all the sites gave good amplicon though the best amplification was seen at ramus site. This study highlights that the ramus of the mandible in the head and neck region can be substituted for femur bone[ 8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ] owing to its easy accessibility and feasibility for bone harvest with its ample nuclear genomic DNA from bone marrow irrespective of the DNA extraction procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%