International Joint Conference on Neural Networks 1989
DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn.1989.118570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing different neural network architectures for classifying handwritten digits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numeral database 6 used for these simulations was collected at Bell Labs [3]. It consists of 1200 isolated handwritten samples of numerals 0..9.…”
Section: B Handwritten Numeral Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The numeral database 6 used for these simulations was collected at Bell Labs [3]. It consists of 1200 isolated handwritten samples of numerals 0..9.…”
Section: B Handwritten Numeral Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This database was then carved into two subsets of 600 samples each -the first five samples of each numeral from every writer were used for training and the rest for testing. Guyon et al [3], and Druker and Le Cun [2], both have reported a generalization performance of 97% with a 256:20:10 network trained using conventional BP, and a 256:40:10 network trained using 'double backpropagation', respectively. For the simulations presented here, the 256 element matrices were transformed into 32 element vectors by summing the rows and columns.…”
Section: B Handwritten Numeral Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations