2021
DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1949034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing different CT, PET and MRI multi-modality image combinations for deep learning-based head and neck tumor segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(13 reference statements)
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main subsite of the challenge was the oropharyngeal tumor and the winner of the challenge achieved a mean Dice of 0.76, but the image modalities used were PET/CT. Additionally, Ren et al [31] compared the use of PET/CT/MRI as different input image combinations for the automatic segmentation of head and neck GTV and observed that, when including PET, the segmentation performance improved. Considering all the above, it is possible that PET is a useful modality for the task of head and neck tumor segmentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main subsite of the challenge was the oropharyngeal tumor and the winner of the challenge achieved a mean Dice of 0.76, but the image modalities used were PET/CT. Additionally, Ren et al [31] compared the use of PET/CT/MRI as different input image combinations for the automatic segmentation of head and neck GTV and observed that, when including PET, the segmentation performance improved. Considering all the above, it is possible that PET is a useful modality for the task of head and neck tumor segmentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tissue changes from previous local therapies strongly impede target volume delineation in recurrent head and neck cancer. Combining multi-modality imaging including CT, diffusionweighted MRI and positron emission tomography (PET)/ CT can be crucial to mitigate uncertainties in contouring [32,33]. One patient with type E local failure developed tumor recurrence within 5 mm of the CTV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All models were trained using 5-fold cross-validation, with a train\test split of 48\12 cases every fold. To minimize the training variation, we used ensemble learning [ 9 , 21 , 22 , 23 ], where the highest cumulated in-class segmentation probability of 5 sequentially trained networks decided the final segmentation map. The training and evaluation times were saved.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%