2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing different control strategies for indoor thermal comfort aimed at the evaluation of the energy cost of quality of building

Abstract: The rapid improvement in the standard of living requires more detailed and sophisticated methods of evaluating comfort conditions. But, maintaining thermal comfort conditions in confined environments may require complex regulation procedures and the proper management of heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. In turn, the requirements for indoor thermal comfort do not necessarily coincide with those of energy saving purposes, which in the last years are

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lee [11] employed the simplified energy analysis procedure to evaluate the fault level that can represent operation situation of HVAC system. Calvino [12] compared the energy consumption under various thermal comfort control strategies. The evaluation logic aimed to optimize the energy consumption and thermal comfort properly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee [11] employed the simplified energy analysis procedure to evaluate the fault level that can represent operation situation of HVAC system. Calvino [12] compared the energy consumption under various thermal comfort control strategies. The evaluation logic aimed to optimize the energy consumption and thermal comfort properly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of model is regarded as a white-box model, which is useful for analytical processes such as prediction and extrapolation [58]. The variation behavior of PPD versus PMV is imperative for the HVAC system to control indoor desired conditions as adopted by many researchers [59][60][61][62][63][64].…”
Section: The Alternative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benchmark case study considered in this paper is the building heating control system, as described by Calvino et al [18] and Chaudhry and Das [19]. The building heating system has not been described in detail, but is represented by a simplified dynamic model [18].…”
Section: Application To a Benchmark Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The building heating system has not been described in detail, but is represented by a simplified dynamic model [18]. Starting from the instantaneous energy balance of the building heating system and some rough assumptions (which we copy here to allow comparison): (a) the energy balance accounts for thermal energy storage, thermal losses to the outside, internal gains and heat supplied by the heatdistributing devices, (b) only transmission losses are accounted for, no ventilation losses, (c) only indoor air capacity is included in the storage term (particular interest in fast variations of indoor air temperature), (d) correlation used for the thermal power of the heat-distributing device in non-nominal conditions (in this correlation the exponent of the system is set to 1 for computational convenience, imitating convection without enclosure), the following equation representing the dynamic behaviour of the building heating system is derived:…”
Section: Application To a Benchmark Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%