2019
DOI: 10.1111/ede.12286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing developmental stability in unisexual and bisexual rock lizards of the genusDarevskia

Abstract: Parthenogenetic species are usually considered to be short‐lived due to the accumulation of adverse mutations, lack of genetic variability, and inability to adapt to changing environment. If so, one may expect that the phenotype of clonal organisms may reflect such genetic and/or environmental stress. To test this hypothesis, we compared the developmental stability of bisexual and parthenogenetic lizards of the genus Darevskia. We assessed asymmetries in three meristic traits: ventral, preanal, and supratempo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 69 publications
(88 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is further supported by the very low heterozygosity found at the genome level in one individual of La Canna sampled in this study [12]. The highest prevalence of cephalic malformations observed in lizards of La Canna is most likely an expression of the detrimental effect of inbreeding depression, as observed in other reptiles [48][49][50][51]. In some specimens, the deformation is restricted to the parietal area, and it seems symmetric, whereas in others it is asymmetric, and involves few to many cephalic scales.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This is further supported by the very low heterozygosity found at the genome level in one individual of La Canna sampled in this study [12]. The highest prevalence of cephalic malformations observed in lizards of La Canna is most likely an expression of the detrimental effect of inbreeding depression, as observed in other reptiles [48][49][50][51]. In some specimens, the deformation is restricted to the parietal area, and it seems symmetric, whereas in others it is asymmetric, and involves few to many cephalic scales.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%