2015
DOI: 10.1007/s40430-015-0355-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing DEA and principal component analysis in the multiobjective optimization of P-GMAW process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these results, the GPE and the Entropy (Step 6) were calculated and the results are shown in Table 5. The GPE is calculated, as shown by [30], through expression…”
Section: Implementation Of the Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on these results, the GPE and the Entropy (Step 6) were calculated and the results are shown in Table 5. The GPE is calculated, as shown by [30], through expression…”
Section: Implementation Of the Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In answering such a query, it was proposed to use two objectively defined selection criteria: Shannon's Entropy Index [29] and Global Percentage Error (GPE) [30]. Entropy can be defined as a measure of probabilistic uncertainty.…”
Section: Mathematical Problems In Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a testing procedure, the p-values for each pair have been re-adjusted. It is then become possible to interpret the effect of levels on the response of significant parameters [30]. In Fig.…”
Section: Anova Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combination of ANN and fuzzy logic has been used by Cruz et al [12] to find out the significant parameters affecting the weld bead width for gas metal arc welded (GMAW) AISI 1020. Rocha et al [13] compared the performance of two multi-objective optimization techniques, i.e., data envelopment analysis (DEA) and principal component analysis (PCA), to find welding parameters that could generate a weld bead geometry of desired quality. Similarly, Adalarasan and Sundaram [14] and Palanivel et al [15] used PCA and ANN, respectively, to optimize the process parameters for friction-stir-welded Al-based alloys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the present study emphasizes finding the laser-beam welding parameters that would result in minimization of weld bead cross-sectional geometry of 2.7mm-thick Hastelloy C-276 sheet by bead-on-plate welding experiment. All the above-mentioned multi-objective optimization techniques [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] have certain level of accuracy of prediction; hence, a new method of optimization has been proposed in the present study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%