2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3033409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Combinations of Linear and Nonlinear Feedback Terms for Ship Motion Control

Abstract: In this paper, combinations of linear and nonlinear feedback terms are investigated for 3 degrees-of-freedom pose and velocity control of ships. Nonlinear control algorithms that are found in the literature often have linear feedback terms, which result in nice globally exponential stability properties when assuming no actuator constraints. However, considering that all actuators have saturation constraints, such stability properties are not feasible in practice. Applying nonlinear feedback terms can be a step… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The desired velocity v d is finally defined to make sure the vehicle reaches the waypoints. It is based on the constant bearing nonlinear approach from [39,40]. It prevents the vehicle from deviating from the path segment by making it converge towards it, while maintaining its velocity along the path.…”
Section: Guidance For Inspection Pathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The desired velocity v d is finally defined to make sure the vehicle reaches the waypoints. It is based on the constant bearing nonlinear approach from [39,40]. It prevents the vehicle from deviating from the path segment by making it converge towards it, while maintaining its velocity along the path.…”
Section: Guidance For Inspection Pathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that the full state feedback is available for the control design model in (38). A backstepping design will result in our proposed control law, giving a cascade structure in the error states [40,41]. Towards this end, the state is transformed by the error signals as…”
Section: Backstepping Maneuvering Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Stability: Based on the theorems and stability proofs in [10], we can conclude that the two controllers have the following stability properties: The origin (z 1 , z 2 ) = (0, 0) is uniformly globally asymptotically stable (UGAS) and on each compact set B ⊂ R 6 containing the origin, it is uniformly exponentially stable (UES) [10]. The MRS model is a nonlinear filter, and it is proven in [4] that the output will be an L 2 signal if the input is an L 2 signal, so it can be concluded that the MRS model does not alter the stability properties of the system.…”
Section: Nonlinear Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) Parameter tuning: The experiments are conducted with the gain parameters shown in Table II. The choice of the gain parameters for the two controllers are based on the tuning rules described in [10]. Here, the goal is to make the kinetic subsystem faster than the kinematic subsystem, which means that the kinetic subsystem needs to have smaller time constants than the kinematic subsystem in the linear region.…”
Section: Nonlinear Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%