Background
Antibody responses to the inactivated seasonal influenza vaccine in individuals with atopic dermatitis (AD) have not been carefully characterized.
Objective
The primary objective of this study was to compare antibody responses to intradermal vaccination in participants with moderate/severe AD to non-atopic participants. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the effect of route of administration, Staphylococcus aureus skin colonization, and disease severity on vaccine response.
Methods
This was an open-label study conducted in the 2012–2013 influenza season at 5 US clinical sites. A total of 360 participants with moderate/severe AD or non-atopic were assessed for eligibility, of which 347 received intradermal or intramuscular vaccination per label and followed for 28 days post-vaccination. The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of participants achieving seroprotection (hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) antibody titer ≥ 1:40 on day 28 post-vaccination).
Results
Seroprotection rates for influenza B, H1N1, and H3N2 were not different (a) between AD participants and non-atopic participants receiving intradermal vaccination and (b) between AD participants receiving intradermal and intramuscular vaccination. Following intradermal –but not intramuscular – vaccination, AD participants with S. aureus colonization experienced (a) lower seroprotection and seroconversion rates and lower HAI titer geometric mean fold-increase against influenza B and (b) lower seroconversion rates against influenza H1N1 than non-colonized AD participants.
Conclusion
AD participants colonized with S. aureus exhibited a reduced immune response to influenza vaccination compared to non-colonized participants after intradermal, but not intramuscular, vaccination. Since most patients with AD are colonized with S. aureus, intramuscular influenza vaccination should be given preference in these patients.