2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-008-0258-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing calibration approaches for 3D ultrasound probes

Abstract: Our results indicate that taking additional scans leads to a significant improvement in the calibration. Furthermore, the obtained calibration and reconstruction precisions suggest the use of a TP.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1], [11] and [4] respectively found a RMS targeting point error of 3.5mm by using 12 2D images, 2.37mm with 56 US volumes and 2.0mm with 36 US volumes. These hand-eye methods use accurate 3D localizers to obtain B i matrices and registration tools to obtain A i matrices.…”
Section: Robot Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[1], [11] and [4] respectively found a RMS targeting point error of 3.5mm by using 12 2D images, 2.37mm with 56 US volumes and 2.0mm with 36 US volumes. These hand-eye methods use accurate 3D localizers to obtain B i matrices and registration tools to obtain A i matrices.…”
Section: Robot Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a majority of medical applications, the calibration of the probe is needed to register all data in the same mathematical space. To overcome this shortcoming the literature mainly presents two types of calibration techniques using external 3D localizers [1]. In these techniques, a tracking reference frame is fixed on the probe and US volumes are acquired from a tracked phantom immersed in a water bath, as it explained in [1], [2] and [3], or by directly registering US volumes [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Usually, calibration methods are classified with respect to the target geometry (a phantom) they rely on. 3D US calibration methods using a 3D US probe have been reviewed specifically in [6], [7].…”
Section: Overview Of 3d Ultrasound Calibration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other reviews have been done specifically for the calibration of 3D US, which compare new methods made possible through the use of a 3D probe. 3,4 Among methods for the calibration of a US probe, there are two commonly used categories of techniques: phantom-based and tracked stylus-based. There are numerous phantom-based calibration methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%