2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing brains by matching connectivity profiles

Abstract: The great promise of comparative neuroscience is to understand why brains differ by investigating the relations between variations in the organization of different brains, their evolutionary history, and their current ecological niche. For this approach to be successful, the organization of different brains needs to be quantifiable. Here, we present an approach to formally comparing the connectivity of different cortical areas across different brains. We exploit the fact that cortical regions can be characteri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
131
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
13
131
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Connectivity‐based parcellation analysis [CBP, Johansen‐Berg et al, ; for reviews see Eickhoff et al, ; Mars et al, ] groups voxels into an area if they show a common pattern of structural brain connectivity with the rest of the brain—distinct from that in neighboring voxels. In the present review, we use connectivity‐based parcellation atlases of TPJ and adjacent IPL that are based on diffusion weighted imaging data [Mars et al, , ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Connectivity‐based parcellation analysis [CBP, Johansen‐Berg et al, ; for reviews see Eickhoff et al, ; Mars et al, ] groups voxels into an area if they show a common pattern of structural brain connectivity with the rest of the brain—distinct from that in neighboring voxels. In the present review, we use connectivity‐based parcellation atlases of TPJ and adjacent IPL that are based on diffusion weighted imaging data [Mars et al, , ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Connectivity fingerprints can then be compared by calculating the Manhattan distance between them (Mars et al, 2016b).…”
Section: Connectivity Fingerprintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, permutation testing was used to test for significant differences in the Manhattan distance between fingerprints of the two subregions, as described in Mars et al (2016). For each hemisphere we tested the hypothesis that the difference between the anatomical connectivity fingerprints to be compared would be larger (or smaller) than expected by chance.…”
Section: Anatomical Connectivity Patterns Of the Psts Subregionsmentioning
confidence: 99%