1999
DOI: 10.2166/wst.1999.0702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Biological Responses to Mill Process Changes: A Study of Steroid Concentrations in Goldfish Exposed to Effluent and Waste Streams from a Canadian Bleached Sulphite Mill

Abstract: During the cycle 1 environmental effects monitoring (EEM) studies, wild fish collected downstream of several Nexfor Canadian pulp mills indicated reduced gonad size or fecundity. A two-year collaborative study between Nexfor Inc. and the National Water Research Institute of Environment Canada was begun to investigate the reproductive responses. The purpose of the study was to assess final effluents from Nexfor Canadian mills for their ability to affect goldfish circulating sex steroids (testosterone, 11-ketote… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reported rates of T production in goldfish testis range from 1 pg/g (unknown GSI) [40] to 20 pg/mg (GSI 2.2%), with the latter corresponding to a plasma T concentration of 3.0 ng/mL [14]. In vitro steroid biosynthetic capacity was not measured in the current study due to limited gonadal tissue availability; however, control male plasma T concentrations were comparable to those reported by MacLatchy & Van Der Kraak [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reported rates of T production in goldfish testis range from 1 pg/g (unknown GSI) [40] to 20 pg/mg (GSI 2.2%), with the latter corresponding to a plasma T concentration of 3.0 ng/mL [14]. In vitro steroid biosynthetic capacity was not measured in the current study due to limited gonadal tissue availability; however, control male plasma T concentrations were comparable to those reported by MacLatchy & Van Der Kraak [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parrott et al [17] used a systematic waste stream approach to investigate sources of chemicals affecting circulating sex steroid levels in goldfish ( Carassius auratus ) at two different pulp mills. A number of waste streams and final effluent were evaluated at a bleached kraft mill (18 streams) and a bleached sulfite mill (14 streams).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, final effluent from both mills after secondary treatment did cause significant steroid depressions, such as a 10fold drop in testosterone. At the bleached sulfite mill, implementation of a number of process changes including increased ClO 2 substitution from 60 to 65%, a reduction in solids losses from the bleach plant, reduced liquor losses through spill management, and increased aeration within secondary treatment may have resulted in elimination of effects on steroid levels [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory fish were exposed to final effluent to assess whether the effluent discharge had potential to cause steroid disruption or whether historical input or some other point or non–point source was responsible for the observed effects in fish captured downstream of the BSM outfall. Goldfish exposed for 21 d on‐site in 1997 to final BSM effluent had one‐tenth the circulating sex steroids of control goldfish [2]. After mill process changes made during 1997–1998, goldfish exposed to final mill effluent did not show dramatic changes in circulating sex steroid concentrations [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goldfish exposed for 21 d on‐site in 1997 to final BSM effluent had one‐tenth the circulating sex steroids of control goldfish [2]. After mill process changes made during 1997–1998, goldfish exposed to final mill effluent did not show dramatic changes in circulating sex steroid concentrations [2]. Fathead minnow ( Pimephales promelas ) tests were conducted to assess whether final effluent could affect fish exposed for longer periods (130 d).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%