2014
DOI: 10.7755/mfr.75.4.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) and Vessel-based Tracking Performance for Locating Acoustically Tagged Fish

Abstract: ABSTRACT-Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV's) are increasingly used to collect physical, chemical, and biological information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results indicate that even though the AUV is moving, and the conditions change throughout the mission, the AUV integrated re ceivers performed at least as well as an individual receiver within the gates. This suggests that AUVs are effective and complementary telemetry assets (Eiler et al 2013). In addition, the complementary information about in situ environmental conditions and the capability of detecting telemetered animals outside of the bounds of a moored acoustic array provide significant value to existing telemetry arrays.…”
Section: Auvs As Effective Telemetry Assetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results indicate that even though the AUV is moving, and the conditions change throughout the mission, the AUV integrated re ceivers performed at least as well as an individual receiver within the gates. This suggests that AUVs are effective and complementary telemetry assets (Eiler et al 2013). In addition, the complementary information about in situ environmental conditions and the capability of detecting telemetered animals outside of the bounds of a moored acoustic array provide significant value to existing telemetry arrays.…”
Section: Auvs As Effective Telemetry Assetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) have demonstrated superior performance for telemetering marine animals (fish and crabs) tagged with coded acoustic transmitters (Eiler et al ). Telemetry, specified for this paper as acoustic tag detection by a hydrophone distinct from telemetry as messages between a remote vehicle and user, has become an important tool for ecological and stock assessment research.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moored hydrophones are useful for experimental designs meant to synoptically detect the presence or passage of multiple tagged animals over long periods, but must defer to costly and laborious vessel‐based tracking for information on animals beyond the array detection limits on the order of km. AUVs can perform some of these tasks (Grothues et al ; Oliver et al ; Haulsee et al ; Breece et al ), which then benefit from deeper, quieter hydrophone positioning (Eiler et al ; Oliver et al ). The application is further justified because other on‐board sensors can provide proximal information on the surrounding habitat, making it possible to integrate fish telemetry data with geomorphic and environmental data (Grothues et al ; Oliver et al ; Haulsee et al , see Lennox et al for a review of telemetry challenges and projections).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Acoustic telemetry, defined here as the detection of fish and other aquatic animals tagged with acoustic transmitters and located using submerged hydrophones, can provide detailed information on the distribution, movements, and habitat use of marine species. Recent advances in equipment (e.g., miniaturization of transmitter components, encoded transmitter signals) and tracking capabilities have substantially enhanced the utility of this approach (Welch et al 2011;Adams et al 2012;Pincock and Johnston 2012;Eiler et al 2013). Acoustic telemetry has numerous advantages over more conventional tagging and recovery methods, which provide information based solely on where the tagged individuals were recaptured and can be biased by disproportional recovery efforts, vulnerability to capture, and variable reporting rates (Seber 1973;Buckland 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%