Comparing Artificial Intelligence Algorithms with Empirical Correlations in Shear Wave Velocity Prediction

Abstract

Accurate estimation of shear wave velocity (Vs) is crucial for modeling hydrocarbon reservoirs. The Vs values can be directly measured using the Dipole Shear Sonic Imager data; however, it is very expensive and requires specific technical considerations. To address this issue, researchers have developed different methods for Vs prediction in underground rocks and soils. In this study, the well logging data of a wellbore in the Iranian Aboozar limestone oilfield were used for Vs estimation. The Vs values were estimated using five available empirical correlations, linear regression technique, and two machine learning algorithms including multivariate linear regression and gene expression programming. Those values were compared with the real Vs data. Furthermore, three statistical indices including correlation coefficient (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the applied techniques. The mathematical correlation obtained by the GEP algorithm delivered the most accurate Vs values with R2 = 0.972, RMSE = 0.000290, and MAE = 0.000208. Compared to the available empirical correlations, the obtained correlation from the GEP approach uses multiple parameters to estimate the Vs, thereby leading to more precise predictions. The new correlation can be used to estimate the Vs values in the Aboozar oilfield and other geologically similar reservoirs.

Shear Wave Velocity Applications in Geomechanics with Focus on Risk Assessment in Carbon Capture and Storage Projects

“…The classic techniques for Vs measurement, e.g., laboratory-scale experiments and wellbore surveys, have long been the gold standard in geoengineering studies. While providing accurate results, they are often time-consuming, labor-intensive, and expensive, thereby making them less feasible for large-scale assessments [159]. Geophysical methods, including seismic refraction [160], surface wave analysis [161,162], and seismic tomography [163] offer cost-effective and energy-efficient alternatives to traditional laboratory testing and borehole measurements.…”