2005
DOI: 10.1080/10920277.2005.10596226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Approximations for Risk Measures of Sums of Nonindependent Lognormal Random Variables

Abstract: In this paper, we consider different approximations for computing the distribution function or risk measures related to a sum of non-independent lognormal random variables. Approximations for such sums, based on the concept of comonotonicity, have been proposed in Dhaene et al. (2002a,b). These approximations will be compared with two well-known moment matching approximations: the lognormal and the reciprocal Gamma approximation. We find that for a wide range of parameter values the comonotonic lower bound app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some error analysis is known for comonotonic bounds of option prices (c.f. Vanduffel et al (2005) and Vanmaele et al (2006)), there appears to be no error estimation in the previous literature on the TVaR of comonotonic lower bound, which we shall use for approximations of risk measures for variable annuity guaranteed benefits. Hence, we first develop a formula for the error estimation.…”
Section: Comonotonicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although some error analysis is known for comonotonic bounds of option prices (c.f. Vanduffel et al (2005) and Vanmaele et al (2006)), there appears to be no error estimation in the previous literature on the TVaR of comonotonic lower bound, which we shall use for approximations of risk measures for variable annuity guaranteed benefits. Hence, we first develop a formula for the error estimation.…”
Section: Comonotonicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known in the literature (c.f. Vanduffel et al (2005)) that in a multivariate lognormal setup with appropriate choices of Λ, the comonotonic lower bound S l provides a better approximation of S than the comonotonic upper bound. Since (2.1) implies (2.2), we have that for any conditioning random variable Λ,…”
Section: Comonotonic Bounds For Sums Of Random Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This property is particularly of interest in a multivariate lognormal setting. In such a setting, the lower bounds turn out to be very accurate, provided the appropriate choice is made for the conditioning random variable Λ, see, e.g., Vanduffel et al (2005b). The lower bound (9) is applied in Dhaene et al (2002b) to derive accurate approximations for European type Asian options in a Black & Scholes setting, in case of discrete averaging of the stock price.…”
Section: Convex Bounds For Sums Of Random Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is the probability of the sum or difference of log-normal random variables? The solution to this question has wide applications in many fields such as finance [1,2], actuarial science [3,4], and physics [5]. Especially, in physics, examples include wave transmittance in random media, dissipation rate of turbulence energy, and temporal fluctuations of some nonlinear systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%