1988
DOI: 10.1300/j274v19n03_04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing and Contrasting Siblings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior research on siblings' roles in a purchase-decision process, are mixed. For instance, Schacter and Stone's (1987) revealed that siblings were found to be different from their parents, which is consistent with the findings of Festinger's (1954). Based on the family traits and structure, the roles of siblings in key decisions in the family are becoming more apparent.…”
Section: Siblingssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Prior research on siblings' roles in a purchase-decision process, are mixed. For instance, Schacter and Stone's (1987) revealed that siblings were found to be different from their parents, which is consistent with the findings of Festinger's (1954). Based on the family traits and structure, the roles of siblings in key decisions in the family are becoming more apparent.…”
Section: Siblingssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Much of this learning takes place through observation and imitation (that is, social learning) as younger siblings emulate and try to keep up with more skilled older brothers and sisters. Research suggests that it is both the cooperative play and the conflictual interactions that assist siblings in learning new skills and defining themselves as individuals (see Brody, 1998;Howe & Ross, 1990;Kramer, 2004;Schacter & Stone, 1987). Even in adulthood and old age, siblings continue to define themselves and measure their success in comparison to their siblings (Conley, 2004;Connidis & Campbell, 1995;Milevsky, 2005).…”
Section: Family Stressors and Sibling Socializationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46,49 Dei denti fi cati on i s stronger for same-sex si bl i ngs because they are more l i kel y to compete w i th each other as a resul t of si mi l ar i nterests and attri butes. Therefore, accordi ng to si bl i ng dei denti ficati on theory, the behavi oural di fferences betw een si bl i ngs are real and parent rati ngs merel y refl ect thi s. How ever, si bl i ng di fferences resul ti ng from the quest for one's ow n i denti ty does not seem to be a pl ausi bl e mechani sm for expl ai ni ng negati ve correl ati ons betw een i nfant tw i ns w ho are onl y just begi nni ng to devel op a sense of sel f. M oreover, si bl i ng dei denti fi cati on theory predi cts that the more similar siblings are, the more likely that they will dei denti fy.…”
Section: Twin Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%