2014
DOI: 10.1111/eci.12371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing alternative design options for chronic disease prevention interventions

Abstract: Background While the randomized clinical trial is considered to provide the highest level of evidence in clinical medicine, its superiority to other study designs in the context of prevention studies is debated. The purpose of this review was (i) to gather evidence about challenges facing both randomized controlled trials and observational designs for the conduct of population-based chronic disease prevention interventions and (ii) to consider the suitability of recently proposed hybrid designs for population-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinically, RCT findings must take precedence, but observational data may identify crucial knowledge gaps in more inclusive populations, approximating real-world conditions, over a longer follow-up duration. Hybrid designs may be needed, especially in dementia prevention, wherein the challenges in RCT design to control the risk factors in large and representative older populations for a sufficient duration may be nearly insurmountable …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinically, RCT findings must take precedence, but observational data may identify crucial knowledge gaps in more inclusive populations, approximating real-world conditions, over a longer follow-up duration. Hybrid designs may be needed, especially in dementia prevention, wherein the challenges in RCT design to control the risk factors in large and representative older populations for a sufficient duration may be nearly insurmountable …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten patients declined due to an extra hospital visit for baseline assessments; an alternative option is to conduct base assessments in participants’ homes or organize transport to facilitate participation. In combination with suggested improvements for a definitive trial, a multicenter approach should be considered to expand the catchment area and the number of eligible patients, as well as other options for alternative designs as was recommended in a recent review [54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of systematic reviews show that less than 50% of recruited patients meet the strict eligibility criteria preset for RCTs. The strict criteria are applied to control for patients' personal and health characteristics that potentially confound the treatments' effects; however, their application yields, on average, small sample sizes 6 . Consequently, the evidence generated from RCTs is of limited applicability to the various subgroups of patients seeking treatment in practice and not represented in the RCTs 7,8 —an issue of external validity.…”
Section: Drive For the Revolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%