2019
DOI: 10.4047/jap.2019.11.1.55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing accuracy of denture bases fabricated by injection molding, CAD/CAM milling, and rapid prototyping method

Abstract: PURPOSE The accuracy of denture bases was compared among injection molding, milling, and rapid prototyping (RP) fabricating method. MATERIALS AND METHODS The maxillary edentulous master cast was fabricated and round shaped four notches were formed. The cast was duplicated to ten casts and scanned. In the injection molding method, designed denture bases were milled from a wax block and fabricated using SR Ivocap injection system. Denture bases were milled from a pre-poly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
81
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
81
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results comparing the fit accuracy between the cast and the maxillary complete denture base were evaluated on the second upper premolar and the second upper molar regions crossing the midpalatal suture, showing relatively high deformation in the conventional method due to polymerization shrinkage and internal stress. The mean value of discrepancies, however, was the lowest in the RP method, followed by that in the milling method and the injection molding method [ 23 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results comparing the fit accuracy between the cast and the maxillary complete denture base were evaluated on the second upper premolar and the second upper molar regions crossing the midpalatal suture, showing relatively high deformation in the conventional method due to polymerization shrinkage and internal stress. The mean value of discrepancies, however, was the lowest in the RP method, followed by that in the milling method and the injection molding method [ 23 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of prepolymerized PMMA block in the subtractive technique prevents the polymerization deformation during processing 6,10–13 . However, for additive technique, unpolymerized resin is three‐dimensional (3D) printed and polymerized by an ultraviolet (UV) or visible light source 14 . A posttreatment stage of UV light irradiation is also required, thus polymerization deformation might occur 11,15 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, patients complain about the difficulty in managing mandibular CDs due to lack of retention rather than maxillary CDs 2,24 . However, previous studies generally focused on the maxillary denture base 5,14,19 . The studies evaluating the mandibular denture base adaptation and the efficacy of different fabrication methods remain scarce.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many factors determine the precision of the printed object, like light intensity, orientation, and`` angle of printing, number of layers, the used software, layer shrinkage, amount of supporting structure, and post-processing steps. 20 At the time of polymerization, the heat-curing resin tends to tilt the artificial teeth. Once the resin is removed from the flask, releasing of residual stresses that occur at the time of packing took place, which contributes to resin shrinkage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%