2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing above-ground biomass among forest types in the Wet Tropics: Small stems and plantation types matter in carbon accounting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
36
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
36
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It supports findings that the application of biome-averaged data tends to underestimate forest carbon stocks as compared to local-level estimates (Grassi et al 2008, Pelletier et al 2010, Preece et al 2012. Primary data reveal high uncertainty surrounding the use of mean estimates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…It supports findings that the application of biome-averaged data tends to underestimate forest carbon stocks as compared to local-level estimates (Grassi et al 2008, Pelletier et al 2010, Preece et al 2012. Primary data reveal high uncertainty surrounding the use of mean estimates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The scaling exponent values for our study (β 1 ≈ 2.891 and 2.769 for stratum 1 and 2 respectively) lie within 2.53 and 3.16 at the 95% confidence limits ( Table 4). As such the above presented empirical allometric relationship of woody biomass fits well in a universal model [10] and confirms the results of Achten et al [25] that Jatropha follows the universal allometric model described by [29] and confirmed by [5,10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Accurate estimates of carbon stocks depend to a great degree on the availability and adequacy of the allometric equations that are used to estimate tree biomass [3,5,6]. Allometric equations are a fundamental tool for the non-destructive estimation of biomass in woody vegetation and their value depends on the empirical data used to construct such equations [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tree DBHs (measured at 1.3 m above the ground) greater than 2 cm were considered for harvesting. The lower DBH threshold of 2 cm was adopted to take into account the high number of low biomass trees in the study [25,26].…”
Section: Selection Of Trees For Harvestingmentioning
confidence: 99%