2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.100893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing a single pile's axial bearing capacity using numerical modeling and analytical techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was initially created to simulate the behavior of shotcrete but is also effective for soil improvement, for example, with jet grout columns. In the shotcrete model, the development of stiffness with time complies with the recommendation of the CEB-FIP model code [66][67][68][69][70][71][72]:…”
Section: Finite Element Mesh Boundary Conditions and Analysis Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was initially created to simulate the behavior of shotcrete but is also effective for soil improvement, for example, with jet grout columns. In the shotcrete model, the development of stiffness with time complies with the recommendation of the CEB-FIP model code [66][67][68][69][70][71][72]:…”
Section: Finite Element Mesh Boundary Conditions and Analysis Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bearing capacities of 10 m, 20 m, 30 m, 40 m, and 50 m long piles were investigated by Ghiasi and Eskandari [33] using numerical and theoretical methods. According to the results obtained, it was concluded that the results of the Peck et al method and the Meyerhof method were similar to the Plaxis 2D results [3,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%