2021
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlvi-m-1-2021-713-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing 3d Digital Technologies for Archaeological Fieldwork Documentation. The Case of Thessaloniki Toumba Excavation, Greece

Abstract: Abstract. Nowadays, there are many methods and techniques for the documentation and the restoration of historic structures and historical artifacts that are commonly used due to their completeness, accuracy and fastness. The use of advanced 3D measurement technologies, by either using terrestrial or aerial means of acquiring digital data, has become an efficient and reliable documentation tool. Within this context, this study focuses on combining terrestrial laser scanning, unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different 3D documentation techniques were tested to ascertain labour and timecost effectiveness, as well as the size and quality of the final product (cf. Galeazzi, 2016;Ferdani et al, 2019; for a comparison between the techniques used at Thessaloniki Toumba, see Stamnas et al, 2021). The first technique involved the use of a laser scanner; the second technique involved structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry using a custom-made Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and a hand-held digital camera (Figure 5).…”
Section: Real-time 3d Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different 3D documentation techniques were tested to ascertain labour and timecost effectiveness, as well as the size and quality of the final product (cf. Galeazzi, 2016;Ferdani et al, 2019; for a comparison between the techniques used at Thessaloniki Toumba, see Stamnas et al, 2021). The first technique involved the use of a laser scanner; the second technique involved structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry using a custom-made Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and a hand-held digital camera (Figure 5).…”
Section: Real-time 3d Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%