2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Yield of Different Diagnostic Tests for Tuberculosis among People Living with HIV in Western Kenya

Abstract: BackgroundDiagnosis followed by effective treatment of tuberculosis (TB) reduces transmission and saves lives in persons living with HIV (PLHIV). Sputum smear microscopy is widely used for diagnosis, despite limited sensitivity in PLHIV. Evidence is needed to determine the optimal diagnostic approach for these patients.MethodsFrom May 2011 through June 2012, we recruited PLHIV from 15 HIV treatment centers in western Kenya. We collected up to three sputum specimens for Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) and fluorescence micro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
9

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…NanoDisk-MS demonstrated similar sensitivity for both PTB cases (87.5%) and clinically challenging EPTB cases (85.7%) in the HIV-positive study population, where it equaled or significantly outperformed Xpert MTB/RIF in terms of sensitivity for detecting EPTB using highly invasive lymph node (84%), pleural fluid (17%), and cerebrospinal fluid (56%) samples in a metaanalysis (34), and significantly outperformed AFB smear (31%), mycobacteria growth indicator tube culture (69%), and Xpert MTB/RIF (66%) in another study (35). Moreover, our results were achieved irrespective of Mtb culture status, and although greater sensitivity was achieved in culture-positive samples, results from culture-negative samples markedly outperformed the WHO-defined 66% optimal sensitivity for new high-priority nonsputum diagnostic tests (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…NanoDisk-MS demonstrated similar sensitivity for both PTB cases (87.5%) and clinically challenging EPTB cases (85.7%) in the HIV-positive study population, where it equaled or significantly outperformed Xpert MTB/RIF in terms of sensitivity for detecting EPTB using highly invasive lymph node (84%), pleural fluid (17%), and cerebrospinal fluid (56%) samples in a metaanalysis (34), and significantly outperformed AFB smear (31%), mycobacteria growth indicator tube culture (69%), and Xpert MTB/RIF (66%) in another study (35). Moreover, our results were achieved irrespective of Mtb culture status, and although greater sensitivity was achieved in culture-positive samples, results from culture-negative samples markedly outperformed the WHO-defined 66% optimal sensitivity for new high-priority nonsputum diagnostic tests (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Detailed study procedures have been described elsewhere [14]. Briefly, the sample frame included all public HIV care and treatment facilities (including associated PMTCT services) with at least 200 enrolled patients in the Siaya, Bondo, and Kisumu East Districts of the Nyanza Province.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patients were more likely to have active TB infections, and so these results may differ from those obtained in routine clinical settings. Other limitations include the low HIV prevalence in the study population, as the assessments of false-negative rates for the different methods may not be representative of populations with high HIV rates [ 21 ], and the use of Xpert MTB/RIF on concentrated samples in this study, which has been previously associated with slightly lower sensitivity on smear-negative samples [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%