2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13137-019-0126-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative verification of discrete and smeared numerical approaches for the simulation of hydraulic fracturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We perform hydromechanical finite element analyses using the open source platform OpenGeoSys (www.opengeosys.org). The fracture created in the first stage (stimulation) is modeled as a local enrichment at the element boundaries applying a Lower‐dimensional Interface Element (LIE) (Watanabe et al., 2012; Yoshioka, Parisio, Naumov, et al., 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We perform hydromechanical finite element analyses using the open source platform OpenGeoSys (www.opengeosys.org). The fracture created in the first stage (stimulation) is modeled as a local enrichment at the element boundaries applying a Lower‐dimensional Interface Element (LIE) (Watanabe et al., 2012; Yoshioka, Parisio, Naumov, et al., 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among its recent extensions are the implementation of numerical methods for the propagation of discontinuities, such as enriched finite element function spaces, non-local formulations and phase-field models for fracture (Watanabe, Wang, Taron, Görke, & Kolditz (2012); ; Yoshioka et al (2019)).…”
Section: Opengeosysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering hydraulic fracturing in the toughness dominated regime (Detournay, 2016), the pressure loss within the crack is negligible and p is spatially constant. Equation 11 is solved by the alternate minimization with respect to the displacement u and the phase‐field v with a constraint of prescribed time‐evolving fluid volume which must be equal to the crack volume, that is, Vinj=Vcrack=Ωboldu·d0.3emnormaldΩ (Yoshioka et al., 2019). The minimization problem can be stated as false(boldu,v,pfalse)=truenormalarg0.3emnormalminscriptFfalse(boldu,d,pfalse){leftarrayuH1arrayvH1,vtvt+Δt, with the constrain Vinj=Ωboldu·v0.3emnormaldΩ. …”
Section: Variational Phase‐field Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%