1992
DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.1310040304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative variability and interval correlation in linear growth of Hong Kong and Sudanese infants

Abstract: Growth in length of children during the first 10 months of life in Hong Kong and Khartoum is compared in terms of levels of between-child variability and length and increment correlations. In Khartoum, all measures of variability are strikingly greater, and correlational patterns differ strikingly from those in Hong Kong. Growth in Hong Kong can be explained largely in terms of a mixture of genetic determination and short-term homeostatic cycles. Such a model does not fit the Khartoum data where there is evide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this is potentially achievable in strictly research projects, in operational programmes this is much less likely to occur. Brush et al (11) overcame the monthly variation in days between measurements by computing the curvilinear relationship between the anthropometric variable, e.g. weight, and the actual days between measurements.…”
Section: Participants and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this is potentially achievable in strictly research projects, in operational programmes this is much less likely to occur. Brush et al (11) overcame the monthly variation in days between measurements by computing the curvilinear relationship between the anthropometric variable, e.g. weight, and the actual days between measurements.…”
Section: Participants and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same procedure was used here because the 'monthly' variation in days was between 22 and 35 days. Consequently, individual polynomial regressions were computed for each woman and, as found by Brush et al, 12 the fit was very good with adjusted R 2 ranging from over 95% to nearly 100%. As a result, the predicted weight at 28-day intervals was computed and these predicted weights were used in all the subsequent analyses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this is potentially achievable in strictly research projects, in operational programmes this is much less likely to occur. Brush et al 12 overcame the monthly variation in days between measurements by computing the curvilinear relationship between the anthropometric variable, e.g. weight, and the actual days between measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional approach whereby nutritional status is assessed relative to external growth standards has been somewhat strengthened by evidence of a clear relationship between undernutrition, so defined, and mortality risk (Chen, Chowdhury andHuffman 1980, Heywood 1986). There is also support for the argument that growth variability provides a measure of environmental adversity that is not dependent on precarious assumptions about growth standards or growth genetics (Harrison and Schmitt 1989, Harrison, Brush, Almedom and Jewell 1990, Brush, Harrison, Baber and Zumrawi 1992. Our analysis in this paper is based on a third, comparative approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%