2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.intacc.2014.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Value Relevance Studies: Country Differences Versus Specification Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Neither of the alternative dependent variables leads to different results compared to the original models. Moreover, the results of Veith and Werner (2014) also indicate that the return window that maximizes the adjusted R 2 of value relevance regressions differs between countries. In Germany, capital markets seem to take longer to fully impound financial information into prices.…”
Section: Variation Of the Dependent Variablementioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neither of the alternative dependent variables leads to different results compared to the original models. Moreover, the results of Veith and Werner (2014) also indicate that the return window that maximizes the adjusted R 2 of value relevance regressions differs between countries. In Germany, capital markets seem to take longer to fully impound financial information into prices.…”
Section: Variation Of the Dependent Variablementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Four segment models, however, substantially decrease the sample size and should thus be interpreted carefully. Veith and Werner (2014) show that the choice of the return window can substantially impact the findings of value-relevance studies. We use stock price 90 days after fiscal year-end as the dependent variable in the original model.…”
Section: Two Segment Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the methodology of Veith and Werner (2014), it is possible to determine that recognised goodwill therefore explains approximately 19.683 per cent of the increased abnormal returns of the conventional hedge.…”
Section: [Insert Figure 1 About Here]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Skinner and Sloan (2002), stocks are allocated to hedge portfolios based on quintiles of market-to-book ratios on the date of portfolio formation. To determine whether investors price recognised goodwill accurately, this study uses the methodology of Veith and Werner (2014) to compare hedge returns of the conventional hedge to those of a hedge where recognised goodwill has been excluded from the market-tobook ratio calculation [3] . This methodology reveals not only whether goodwill is priced by investors (its "value-relevance") but also the degree of accuracy with which it is priced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chambers et al (2007) demonstrate that investors pay more attention to the OCIs reported in the statement of changes in owners' equity although firms could decide the presentation format of CI or OCI information in the financial statements. Rees and Shane (2012) and Veith and Werner (2014) suggest more effort is needed to study the effect of CI reporting from the perspective of accounting standards setting consequences.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%