1983
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.146.2.6294738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative value of bone scintigraphy and radiography in monitoring tumor response in systemically treated prostatic carcinoma.

Abstract: Radionuclide bone scans and skeletal radiographs were obtained before and during combination chemotherapy or initial hormonal treatment in 46 patients with disseminated adenocarcinoma of the prostate. The purpose of the study was to determine the usefulness of these two modalities in evaluating tumor response to therapy. Prior to treatment, bone scans were positive in 44 patients (96%). In all but one patient either bone radiographs or bone marrow biopsy revealed evidence of osseous metastases. In 22 patients … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, the most widely used response criteria are those of National Prostatic Cancer Project (NPCP) (Slack & Murphy, 1984), but these criteria are insufficient for monitoring the turnover of osteoblastic bone metastases. In fact, radiographic resolution of osteoblastic lesions is rare, while the detection of scintigraphic changes requires careful attention to technical details of scanning (Levenson et al, 1983 Patients were considered evaluable for response and toxicity only after they had undergone at least six courses of chemotherapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the most widely used response criteria are those of National Prostatic Cancer Project (NPCP) (Slack & Murphy, 1984), but these criteria are insufficient for monitoring the turnover of osteoblastic bone metastases. In fact, radiographic resolution of osteoblastic lesions is rare, while the detection of scintigraphic changes requires careful attention to technical details of scanning (Levenson et al, 1983 Patients were considered evaluable for response and toxicity only after they had undergone at least six courses of chemotherapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient evaluation for new or recurrent sarcomas is currently done by clinical evaluation, diagnostic radiology procedure (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, angiography), biochemical markers, radionuclide scans, and histological examination. The delayed bone scan is the most frequently used radionuclide procedure for evaluation of primary and metastatic bone tumors [28][29][30]. It has a high sensitivity for bone sarcomas and metastatic bone disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is usually no bony deformity or overgrowth. Plain radiography is extremely useful in this situation and frequently resolves the problem (7). …”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%