2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.12.099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative transduction efficiencies of human and nonhuman adenoviral vectors in human, murine, bovine, and porcine cells in culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
87
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for the apparent lower susceptibility of HepG2 cells in vitro are not known. Both cell lines express the CAR receptor and high levels of hTERT mRNA, but Hep3B cells internalize adenoviral particles more efficiently than HepG2 cells (18)(19)(20). However, both cell lines are comparably efficient at transferring adenoviral DNA into the nucleus and replicating the viral genome (20).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for the apparent lower susceptibility of HepG2 cells in vitro are not known. Both cell lines express the CAR receptor and high levels of hTERT mRNA, but Hep3B cells internalize adenoviral particles more efficiently than HepG2 cells (18)(19)(20). However, both cell lines are comparably efficient at transferring adenoviral DNA into the nucleus and replicating the viral genome (20).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it can be expected that any vaccine prime-boost combination containing rAd5 will be seriously inhibited, a novel Ad vector distinct from rAd35 and rAd5 is required. Such a vector could be generated from the pool of human Ads, provided that human serotypes with low seroprevalence are still available, or prime-boost combinations could be tested utilizing Ad vectors developed from nonhuman Ad serotypes such as bovine (2), canine (23), avian (26), or chimpanzee (13) vectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the first adenovirus studies were carried out with human serotype 5, and to a lesser extent human serotype 2, subsequent studies have led to identification of multiple adenovirus serotypes, both human and nonhuman (Dobbelstein, 2003;Bangari et al, 2005;Stone and Lieber, 2006). This led to the concept of ''seroswitch,'' that is, to circumvent the antiadenovirus immunity elicited by the initial administration of an adenovirus gene transfer vector by administering an adenovirus vector comprised of a different serotype carrying the same gene, a strategy that is effective in experimental animals (Mastrangeli et al, 1996;Mack et al, 1997).…”
Section: Adenovirus Gene Transfer Vectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%