Comparative transcriptomics reveals the conserved building blocks involved in parallel evolution of diverse phenotypic traits in ants

Abstract

BackgroundReproductive division of labor in eusocial insects is a striking example of a shared genetic background giving rise to alternative phenotypes, namely queen and worker castes. Queen and worker phenotypes play major roles in the evolution of eusocial insects. Their behavior, morphology and physiology underpin many ecologically relevant colony-level traits, which evolved in parallel in multiple species.ResultsUsing queen and worker transcriptomic data from 16 ant species we tested the hypothesis that conserved sets of genes are involved in ant reproductive division of labor. We further hypothesized that such sets of genes should also be involved in the parallel evolution of other key traits. We applied weighted gene co-expression network analysis, which clusters co-expressed genes into modules, whose expression levels can be summarized by their ‘eigengenes’. Eigengenes of most modules were correlated with phenotypic differentiation between queens and workers. Furthermore, eigengenes of some modules were correlated with repeated evolution of key phenotypes such as complete worker sterility, the number of queens per colony, and even invasiveness. Finally, connectivity and expression levels of genes within the co-expressed network were strongly associated with the strength of selection. Although caste-associated sets of genes evolve faster than non-caste-associated, we found no evidence for queen- or worker-associated co-expressed genes evolving faster than one another.ConclusionsThese results identify conserved functionally important genomic units that likely serve as building blocks of phenotypic innovation, and allow the remarkable breadth of parallel evolution seen in ants, and possibly other eusocial insects as well.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-016-0902-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Drosophila transcriptional network is structured by microbiota

“…Studies of transcript abundance and gene coexpression both rely on gene expression data, but address distinct questions: The object of gene coexpression analysis is not gene expression, but the coordination of the expression of suites (or “modules”) of genes [6–10]. Differential coexpression analysis (DiffCoEx) identifies modules of genes that show similar changes in coexpression (either relative to each other, relative to the rest of the transcriptome, or both) between conditions, isolating regulatory patterns that are altered or preserved.…”

Changes in gene DNA methylation and expression networks accompany caste specialization and age‐related physiological changes in a social insect

“…The minimum module size was set to 30 (Langfelder & Horvath, ). As detailed in Morandin et al (), we next calculated average signed, normalized gene DNA methylation values (called an “eigengene”) to determine the relationship between modules and phenotypic traits (e.g., caste and developmental stage). The eigengene is defined as the first principal component of a module and represents the gene DNA methylation profile.…”

Transcriptomics and neuroanatomy of the clonal raider ant implicate an expanded clade of odorant receptors in chemical communication

“…A long-standing debate in the field of sociogenomics is the importance of conserved genes vs. novel genes in social evolution (2,3). Researchers have tried to address this question primarily by either looking for signatures of positive selection associated with the evolution of sociality (43,44) or by looking for genes that are differentially expressed between different morphological and behavioral castes (45,46). An alternative approach is to find genes with specific functions in social behavior and to examine their evolution.…”