2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative transcriptomic analysis of in situ and onboard fixed deep-sea limpets reveals sample preparation-related differences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon was also observed in tubeworms recovered at atmosphere pressure (Dixon et al, 2002). Yan et al (2022) confirmed the extensive transcriptomic variations in response to pressure during unpressurized sampling. These studies suggest the necessity of pressurized sampling in deep-sea biology studies.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…This phenomenon was also observed in tubeworms recovered at atmosphere pressure (Dixon et al, 2002). Yan et al (2022) confirmed the extensive transcriptomic variations in response to pressure during unpressurized sampling. These studies suggest the necessity of pressurized sampling in deep-sea biology studies.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…Before the RAD, only two other methods had been developed for robotic deep-sea collection of delicate midwater species ( 22 ). Using those methods, deep-sea animals are captured and brought to the surface accompanied with: (i) complexities in keeping the animal alive ( 54 ), (ii) preservatives, such as formalin or ethanol, harden and alter tissue components ( 55 ), and (iii) there is an overexpression of stress genes as the animal has undergone a marked change in pressure and temperature before tissue preservation ( 56 ). Because of those issues, when a soft-bodied animal, such as a jellyfish, is preserved with alcohol or formalin after collection, it is no longer possible to obtain detailed and nuanced information regarding gene expression from the animal at depth or of tissue volume, structure, or dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar experimental approaches in model polychaete species are needed to assess if DNA methylation exerts direct epigenetic control on gene expression in this group. Since deep-sea worms have not been successfully reared in the laboratory, it will be very hard to conduct in vitro experiments, although the animals can be fixed in situ ( Yan et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway, which is responsible for degrading misfolded or damaged proteins and plays an important role in cold water–adapted species ( Todgham et al 2017 ), was overrepresented amongst genes with hypomethylated promoters in all three worms. Our samples were not fixed in situ, and thus, we cannot exclude that the methylation profiles of the worms partly reflect the decompression stress they suffered during their recovery to the ship ( Yan et al 2022 ). However, methylomes tend to be much more stable in time than transcriptomes ( Strader et al 2020 ), and thus, environmental stress during the short timeframe of samples recovery (a few hours at most) is unlikely to have had substantial consequences on worms’ methylomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%